November 8, 2021
By Leon Briggs, head of property & national executive adjuster, Australia
In most court decisions there can be surprises, and one could say that the decision of Jagot J in the Second COVID-19 Insurance Test Case had its own share of the unexpected.
In reviewing the decision in the Second Test Cases, the aspects that relate to COVID-19 coverage are vitally important to the parties involved, but COVID-19 is an unusual and, hopefully, unique event. Therefore, answers as to how policies respond to pandemics are perhaps of limited usefulness for the future. Jagot J’s decision contains three points, however, that might well have ramifications for business interruption claims in the future.
Click here to view or download the full article.
Australia
Canada
Denmark
France
Ireland
Netherlands
New Zealand
Spain and Portugal
United Kingdom
United States